[CQ-Contest] zero pointers - flaw in the analysis?

jukka.klemola@nokia.com jukka.klemola at nokia.com
Tue Nov 29 16:43:36 EST 2005


 
...
>Rick, et al:
>
>I don't believe that you should figure out how many hours were 
>wasted by using the methodology you described; specifically, 
>by finding your average rate per hour and dividing total zero 
>pointers by that rate.
>
...
>Equally, if the rate was very slow when the zero pointers 
>called, then you likely didn't "lose" any time at all...you 
>just were able to "keep the frequency" or able to "prevent the 
>op from getting bored and/or not paying close attention."
>
>You have the logs....check it out, if you are so inclined.  It 
>may give you some peace of mind.
...
>Well, best of luck in the next (not that you need luck).
>
>de Doug KR2Q


This view is happily agreed in Northern Europe, under the Aurora.


73,
Jukka OH6LI @ OH0V


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list