[CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP?
Rex Maner
k7qq at netzero.net
Sun Apr 30 21:48:35 EDT 2006
I didn't read anywhere that I didn't have to copy counties for W7's I did
read however I can work him in a different count and get another Q for the
score. and on county lines I log him twice , If I only put the state He is
just one QSO no matter how many counties he might want to work me from. ,
What I want to know has been ask, HOW do I do both the NEQP and 7QP at
the same time or has somone put the wrong date for one of the test ???
Quack aka: Rex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Frenaye" <frenaye at hughes.net>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP?
> At 02:10 PM 4/30/2006, N7MAL wrote:
>>W7 stations are not required to log the county name because there are no
>>extra points for W7's to work W7 counties. W7's only get State credit.
>
> I sure hope that isn't true. In a contest, a completed exchange means
> that both stations copy the callsigns and the full exchange. Contesters
> should never assume it isn't necessary to copy part of the exchange.
> In the ARRL DX contest, USA stations copy power, that isn't part of the
> multiplier. In the NAQP and Sprint contests, among other things, you copy
> the name, but it isn't part of the multiplier, in most contests you copy
> the signal report, that isn't used in the multiplier.
>
> Contest sponsors check logs in lots of ways. Sometimes they don't check
> them much at all, and just publish the scores. Some just check the
> callsigns, some pull out duplicates, some check exchanges including the
> signal report, etc. They may check different things in different years
> as new or different people have the log checking responsibility. What
> gets checked is also somewhat dependent upon what gets commonly screwed up
> by those in the contest. If packet cheating appears to be influencing
> scores, that may be checked a lot closer the next year.
>
> The best contest sponsors do a combination of all of the things I listed
> above, many do even more.
>
> To presume that stations in the 7th call area do not have to copy the
> state/county of others in W7 is not a good plan unless the sponsors have
> specifically said it isn't required - in a quick look I didn't see it, and
> I sure hope that isn't their intent. In the New England QSO Party W1's
> do have to copy the state/county of other W1's (and that isn't 100%
> supported by some entrants, but that's how it works).
>
> Just remember that in a contest you copy the call and full exchange and
> make a really good effort to get it all correct, or don't log it at all
> (and log it on the right band and mode). Strive for 100%.
>
> -- Tom/K1KI
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New England QSO Party - May 6-7, 2006 http://www.neqp.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/327 - Release Date: 4/28/2006
>
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list