[CQ-Contest] QRP

[Pete Smith]

Since I apparently provoked this, let me make myself clear - I WAS NOT serious about the scoring idea.  I thought raising the "irony flag" would make that clear.

I could not agree more with Randy's central point - if you want to score, you need to work the third and fourth and fifth-layer stations, many of whom will be QRP.  I have done reasonably well in the ARRL DX Contest for several years, and in that contest you know which are QRP, so I know there are a bunch of them, along with 100-watters with attic dipoles.  

My point is, it is NOT helpful to have a QRP station sign /QRP.  The rest of us will work you, for sure, but we'd just as soon you didn't add 4 characters to your call, when you are already 50 dB down from the loud guys.

73, Pete N4ZR

At 01:58 PM 8/10/2006, Randy Johnson wrote:
>As one who recently operated Field Day as a QRP station - it was an absolute blast!!!!! - I have a QRP suggestion. When a loud station who can't hear you stomps on you while you are vainly calling CQ in a "non-contest," it doesn't feel any better than when, as a weak station, you get stomped on during a real contest. 
>
>It seems obvious to me that in any contest ALL of the big guns work each other. Right? So to some extent, a big score is dependent upon 
>
>1. working the itinerant station who gets on for a half-hour and only works the loud stations, which they do anyway, and 
>2. how many weak stations you work, some of whom, by definition, will be QRP stations 
>
>If I am right, there is an incentive for ALL participants to create conditions where more QRP stations can be worked.  I'll let others debate the "special score" suggestion made below, but it seems to me as if it would make sense to create a "QRP zone" in contests where QRP stations wouldn't be as likely to get stomped on and where a BIG GUN who has worked almost everyone else can go find someone he hasn't. 
>
>I would like to suggest that some 10kHz slot be set aside by gentleman's agreement for QRP to call CQ stations. For CW, the 060 to 070 slot might work well in smaller contest where activity doesn't get that high. Or how about 090 to 100 in the bigger ones?  It's not generally busy in domestic contest, and doesn't interfere with PSKer's and RTTYers.  Point is that if you pick that zone right, NO ONE ELSE can possibly get offended by feeling something is getting taken away from him.
>
>This would have an additional benefit of encouraging more QRP stations to participate in contests. These days - total WA guess - but probably less than 5% of participants are QRP. Would creating this type of incentive encourage more to try a serious effort?
>
>My suggestion is that, if I survive the flaming for this suggestion, those in power pick SOME upcoming contest, perhaps a state QSO part that gets a lot of activity, like CQP, and give it a trial shot.
>
>Randy W6SJ
>
>
>At the risk of being accused of excessive irony, I suggest that anyone who logs a QRP station in a contest should get double QSO points for the extra effort involved, and if the QRP station sends /QRP,the other station should get 4X points as a PITA bonus.
>
>73, Pete N4ZR
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest