[CQ-Contest] Get Rid of the Assisted Category
Kelly Taylor
ve4xt at mts.net
Sun Dec 17 22:52:03 EST 2006
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane at ei5di.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Get Rid of the Assisted Category
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov at w5ov.com>
To: "'Dave Lawley'" <g4buo at compuserve.com>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>
I agree with Dave G4BUO that there's a fundamental
difference between SO and SO-Assisted entry classes,
and I have no inclination to support contests which
do not recognise this.
I would agree with this as well, IF there were strong statistical support to
suggest that SO-A ops are at a significant advantage to SO ops.
The empirical evidence strongly suggests that the "assisted" class is at
best a major distraction or a tool to meet other objectives than merely
winning a contest.
If SO-A was such an advantage, the SO-A guys would consistently beat the
unassisted. That doesn't happen. In contest after contest, the undistracted
ops always outperform the SO-distracted ops. Which goes back to an adage in
contesting: rate wins contests. You can't get rate if you're always chasing
spots and the fewer Qs you have to multiply, the less each multiplier is
worth.
One contest where an SO beats an SO-A could be an anomaly. But almost
without fail, those who claim assisted -- even with the most serious of
operations under their belt -- always fall behind the unassisted.
So I think we can conclude two things: 1. there is no advantage to cheating
on assisted (if the most serious guys who don't cheat can't beat the
unassisted, where's the advantage?) and 2. there remains little need to
distinguish the two.
Single op is single op. One butt in chair. One person does all the
operating. And if one person can do it with more than one radio, that's an
advantage they have earned through lots and lots of hard work (and that's
aside from installing the hardware) and which they should be due.
If packet really created an advantage, I'd say no way. But since year after
year shows it doesn't, I don't see why it matters.
73, kelly
ve4xt
ps: I don't use packet, by the way.
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list