[CQ-Contest] Get Rid of the Assisted Category

Jamie Dupree NS3T ns3t at arrl.net
Mon Dec 18 17:48:14 EST 2006


Sorry guys - I messed up my own conclusions!  

Yes, the figures show that UN-assisted guys dominate.

My argument would be - even when you let the guys use spots
enter the same single op category - the UN-assisted ops  would do better.

My apologies for clouding things.  Get rid of the assisted category...
very little would change about who wins.


73 Jamie NS3T

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: PaulKB8N at aol.com 
  To: ns3t at arrl.net ; cq-contest at contesting.com 
  Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:58 PM
  Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Get Rid of the Assisted Category


  In a message dated 12/18/2006 3:31:14 P.M. Central Standard Time, ns3t at arrl.net writes:
    What I did was take the top scores from assisted and unassisted and
    simply combine them into a top 20.  Pretty simple.  What does it show?
    Other than in HP CW, the assisted operators score higher and dominate
    the top 20 combined standings.

  Jamie,

   
  Huh?  Am I reading your data wrong, or am I missing something?  It appears that the top assisted guys are 7th on average in the overall top twenty standings and that only 25-30% of the top twenty scores are assisted.

  Unless I'm completely out to lunch with my interpretation of the data, I wouldn't consider that as "dominating".

  Paul, K5AF


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list