[CQ-Contest] Get Rid of the Assisted Category
Jamie Dupree NS3T
ns3t at arrl.net
Mon Dec 18 17:48:14 EST 2006
Sorry guys - I messed up my own conclusions!
Yes, the figures show that UN-assisted guys dominate.
My argument would be - even when you let the guys use spots
enter the same single op category - the UN-assisted ops would do better.
My apologies for clouding things. Get rid of the assisted category...
very little would change about who wins.
73 Jamie NS3T
----- Original Message -----
From: PaulKB8N at aol.com
To: ns3t at arrl.net ; cq-contest at contesting.com
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Get Rid of the Assisted Category
In a message dated 12/18/2006 3:31:14 P.M. Central Standard Time, ns3t at arrl.net writes:
What I did was take the top scores from assisted and unassisted and
simply combine them into a top 20. Pretty simple. What does it show?
Other than in HP CW, the assisted operators score higher and dominate
the top 20 combined standings.
Jamie,
Huh? Am I reading your data wrong, or am I missing something? It appears that the top assisted guys are 7th on average in the overall top twenty standings and that only 25-30% of the top twenty scores are assisted.
Unless I'm completely out to lunch with my interpretation of the data, I wouldn't consider that as "dominating".
Paul, K5AF
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list