[CQ-Contest] Not QSLing Sprint QSOs - Is this OK?
rb at austin.rr.com
Fri Feb 10 09:56:26 EST 2006
One of the best Sprint techniques I've picked up is for getting a fill at
the end of the QSO. If I need a fill, I send a string of dits. Sending
"nr", "name", etc., might be perceived as callsign if several are calling,
but a few dits stands out.
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tree
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 5:22 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Not QSLing Sprint QSOs - Is this OK?
n Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:13:39AM -0600, K4RO Kirk Pickering wrote:
> I've noticed some Sprint operators repeatedly do not
> QSL a completed Sprint QSO. Some of those operating
> in this fashion are in the top ten, and my guess is
> that they are off making a QSO on the second radio
> after they got my number OK. Is this considered proper
> technique among the top tier two radio Sprint operators?
I am really surprised anyone in the top ten is doing this. Once
or twice in the contest - I have this happen where someone doesn't
send me a QSL. Depending on how I feel, I might take the QSO out.
It is more common for someone to not send both calls as part of
the exchange (mostly this is from a non-competitive entry).
There are enough people that will remove a QSO if not properly
acknowledged, that you will greatly impact your score if you
do not do this.
I am one of those guys who sends "TU". It might be delayed a beat
or two while I am typing your exchange in - or if I am waiting for
my CQ to finish on the other band... but it will be sent.
tree at kkn.net
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest