[CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories

K5ZM k5zm at comcast.net
Mon Jan 16 23:35:44 EST 2006


Do that, and NA loses it's unique appeal. (IMO, YMMV) It becomes 'just
another contest' with very little to differentiate it from all the other
domestic tests. 

'zm 


--
www.k5zm.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of ku8e at bellsouth.net
> Sent: Monday, 16 January, 2006 7:22 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories
> 
>   With all the discussion going on about big gun vs little guns, guest
operators
> etc.. in NAQP has anyone ever thought of incorporating a tribander/wires
class
> into the
>  the contest rules. It seems like this works well for WPX .
> 
>   Personally, I would like to see NAQP have a high , low and QRP category.
It
> would then have something for everyones taste.
> 
> 
>   73, Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest




More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list