[CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU

[Mike Fatchett]

Unless you have recorded or witnesses absolute proof that you worked XX1XX
how would anyone know that contacts were removed?

I thought I worked FT5XO on 75M SSB but I was not in the log.  Simultaneous
contacts happen all the time.  I would have bet a big steak dinner I was in
the log.  

Mike W0MU

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of k3bu at optonline.net
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 7:47 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Cc: Zack Widup; Gord Kosmenko
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU

Yea, but no way for you to mark which QSO is 0 point, not to be counted.
Claimed score is for ???
If M/S goofs and makes illegal QSO because of the timing rule, they just
take it out of the log and me/you get hit and UNJUSTLY penalized. Some say
so what, everybody does get. But when you are QRP, make dozen QSOs and have
quarter of them taken away and possible record, it HURTS like hell. (not
really, it only a goofy hobby :-)

Yuri Blanarovich, K3BU

----- Original Message -----
From: Zack Widup <w9sz at prairienet.org>
Date: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:04 am
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU

> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Gord Kosmenko wrote:
> 
> > 
> > The Cabrillo format log submission has no claimed score, the logger 
> > checkers determine the score. I still do not agree with this type of 
> > adjudication.
> > 
> 
> ???  My Cabrillo logs all have a line "CLAIMED-SCORE:" followed by a 
> number.
> 
> 73, Zack W9SZ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest