[CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU

[Jack Brindle]

Yeah, but you don't have to compete with the big boys who are out for  
blood. Well, at least until Tree comes along and pulls another QRP SS  
on us... ;-)

On Jul 27, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote:

> Another succinct testimony why "Life is too short for QRP!"  :-)
>
> 73 de Bob - K0RC
>
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:46:51 -0400
> From: k3bu at optonline.net
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Cc: Zack Widup <w9sz at prairienet.org>, Gord Kosmenko
> <gkosmenko at arrowspeed.com>
> Message-ID: <de39d5f02bdce.44c88b8b at optonline.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Yea, but no way for you to mark which QSO is 0 point, not to be  
> counted. Claimed score is for ???
> If M/S goofs and makes illegal QSO because of the timing rule, they  
> just take it out of the log and me/you get hit and UNJUSTLY  
> penalized. Some say so what, everybody does get. But when you are  
> QRP, make dozen QSOs and have quarter of them taken away and  
> possible record, it HURTS like hell. (not really, it only a goofy  
> hobby :-)
>
> Yuri Blanarovich, K3BU
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Zack Widup <w9sz at prairienet.org>
> Date: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:04 am
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU
>
>> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Gord Kosmenko wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The Cabrillo format log submission has no claimed score,
>>> the logger checkers determine the score. I still do not
>>> agree with this type of adjudication.
>>>
>>
>> ???  My Cabrillo logs all have a line "CLAIMED-SCORE:" followed by
>> a
>> number.
>>
>> 73, Zack W9SZ
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

- Jack Brindle, W6FB
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
---------------------