[CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R

[John Langdon]

How about separate classes for those with supportive spouses (make meals,
cover the telephone, let dogs in and out, etc.), versus neutral spouses
(leave for the contest weekend) versus unsupportive spouses (pop into the
shack with interruptions once per hour)?

73 John N5CQ

-----Original Message-----
From: sawyered at earthlink.net [mailto:sawyered at earthlink.net] 
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 12:20 AM
To: dezrat at copper.net
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R

Nothing will get you off that, Bill.

How about the big vs. little antenna system, hard line vs. crappy coax,
number of miles from the Atlantic in DX contests, number of miles from the
Northeast in Domestic contests (not sure what the best number for that is,
but it sure isn't 0), good rigs with filters vs. tube rigs, etc, etc.

Ed  N1UR

-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Turner <dezrat at copper.net>
>Sent: Jul 29, 2006 10:01 PM
>To: sawyered at earthlink.net
>Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R
>
>ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
>On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:17:35 -0400 (GMT-04:00), you wrote:
>
>
>>So please, can we get off of the SO1R vs SO2R thing....
>
>------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------
>
>Shall we also get off the HP/LP thing? The SO/MO thing? The
>assisted/unassisted thing?
>
>Those operations were separated into their own classes because each
>one had a *significant* advantage/disadvantage over the other.
>
>One radio/two radio has a similar significant difference and should be
>treated the same.
>
>Bill, W6WRT

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest