[CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG

[Rex Maner]

> I doubt anyone in San Diego  would be so stupid as to send SD.

NOW  NOW     They  already have sent   ??6XXX for a call  that should be the 
answer  after all

Quack


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "N6KI Dennis Vernacchia" <n6ki_73 at sbcglobal.net>
To: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q at msn.com>
Cc: "cq-contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG


> Any contestor, worth working, in San Diego, knows to send SDG
>
> Unless some real newbies showed up, I doubt anyone in San Diego
> would be so stupid as to send SD
>
> 73, Dennis N6KI
> Sandy Eggo
>
> RICHARD BOYD wrote:
>> I had a number of "sixes" send their section as SD.  I automatically 
>> converted that to SDG until I realized that one of the sixes I was 
>> working probably was, I recalled, in South Dakota, so I logged it as SD, 
>> which is what he sent.  Now I wonder about those couple before that that 
>> had send SD -- were they in South Dakota or in San Diego.  Oh well.  If I 
>> lose a couple QSOs that won't kill me.  In hindsight, I realize whenever 
>> I hear SD sent and it's not a zero, and particularly if it's a six, I 
>> have to ask for clarification, "SDG?"
>>
>> 73 - Rich, KE3Q
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.13.32/523 - Release Date: 11/7/2006 
> 1:40 PM
>
>