[CQ-Contest] Quick question

[Guy Molinari]

Yes, thanks Ev.   That is exactly why I asked the question.   The answer I got was the one I was anticipating.   I just wish the ARRL would use similar wording for both the Unlimited as well as Multiop classes.   Rules should be somewhat terse but not ambiguous.
 
73 - Guy, N7ZG



> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:58:59 -0800> From: w2ev at yahoo.com> To: cq-contest at contesting.com> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Quick question> > ----- Original Message ----> From: Guy Molinari guy_molinari at hotmail.com> > > The SS rules say that spotting assistance is allowed for multi-ops. Does this mean general use of the packet cluster, or an op on a second radio?> > Sorry for the dumb question.> ---------------------------> > Hi Guy,> I'm interested in the reply to your inquiry, too. Interestingly, this is related to an earlier e-mail in which I asked for the definition of "spotting". It is a term that is used to reference something that is often not allowed, yet it is undefined.> > As a result, it is often used in counterintuitive ways. In this case, "spotting" and "assistance" are two different terms in the contesting world...or are they? :)> > Ev, W2EV> > > _______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list> CQ-Contest at contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_________________________________________________________________
Use Messenger to talk to your IM friends, even those on Yahoo!
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=7adb59de-a857-45ba-81cc-685ee3e858fe