[CQ-Contest] Easy way to correct answer

Jeff Maass jmaass at k8nd.com
Mon Nov 13 00:55:42 EST 2006


 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of N6HC at aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 9:36 PM
> To: w5ov at w5ov.com; cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Easy way to correct answer
> 
> In a message dated 11/12/06 10:12:28 A.M. Pacific Standard 
> Time, w5ov at w5ov.com writes:
> 
> So, while I see us on  the same side in the battle, I will 
> continue to be vocal and speak out against  the tyranny.
> 
> I wish you god speed.  Just be wise enough to pick and choose 
> your  battles 
> carefully.  Not all injustice requires calling out the  
> militia.  I'll be right 
> beside you when the battle is crucial.
> Arnie N6HC

That's good, because now that we know that we 
cannot take the League's published contest rules
(guidelines? suggestions?) as Gospel without
Contest Desk interpretation, there are many
battles to come...

Hmmm, SS rules don't say you have to send **your**
section as a part of the exchange, just "ARRL/RAC
Section". Maybe I can send "ND" (it's an ARRL
Section!) This is convenient, since I'll be out of
the country for Phone SS. I'll have to ask The Desk.

I'm sure that ARRL will now re-publish SS rule 4.4
to make clear that the check has nothing to do
with the "year first licensed", as that is now their
official stated position. Published rules should be
accurate and complete.

73,  Jeff  K8ND



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list