[CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation]
k.alexander at rogers.com
Thu Sep 7 08:54:47 EDT 2006
That's why this idea is such a non-starter, Ev.
Categorizing is the first thing you have to do to
extract any meaning at all from the contest results.
Call it filtering if you want, it's the same thing.
It baffles me why you think you can get away without
73 - Ken
--- Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting at yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Robert Naumann <w5ov at w5ov.com> wrote:
> > OK, so what you're saying is that instead of
> > everyone closely following the rules (hey, this is
> > hypothetical), you want to do away with the rules,
> > let everyone do whatever they want
> Not at all. This is a reprint of the statement that
> started this thread...
> "What if we are attempting to make sense out of
> by categorizing things that need not be categorized?
> What if we realized that it's OK to not categorize
> (attempt to find order in chaos)?"
> There has never been any reference to eliminating
> rules and creating a free-for-all.
> Ev, W2EV
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest