[CQ-Contest] CW Accuracy

K5ZM k5zm at comcast.net
Tue Sep 12 01:01:10 EDT 2006

Not to mention having to put up with lids! Yes. There's actually a "lid
factor" incorporated into MR. Actually, it seems to increase right along
with one's progress. Most frustrating :) 

But I do tend to agree: More often than not, it's not so much having
miscopied a call as it is having mistyped it. Argh! 

BTW, Barry... Where are you on the MR high score list?? I'd fully expected
to see you in the Top Ten. But I went all the way down 'til I saw my own
call -and I know you're not below that! :) 

Are you using a different call? 


Ian, K5ZM 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 6:36 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Accuracy
> There's no question age is a factor.  I've been doing some RUFZ
> practicing lately and I find progress VERY slow.  As a matter of fact, I
> think I've only improved back to the level I was at when I was a teenager.
> While I enjoy running RUFZ, it's not ideal for improving contest skills,
> as you're really not copying calls in real time - you have as long as
> you want to enter the call.
> Try Morserunner.  It's an excellent contest simulation with pileups,
> exchanges to copy, and time pressure.  As you become more proficient,
> increase the speed a little bit at a time.
> 73,
> Barry, W2UP
> W4ZW said:
> After reviewing a few of my past log UBN reports, I decided to find out
> where I was busting calls.  So I started working out with RUFZ-XP and made
> several interesting discoveries.  The first culprit is my typing ability,
> lack there of.  I never learned touch typing and have adopted the hunt and
> peck method until I feel fairly comfortable, but limited by speed.
> I switched to computer logging completely about 15 years ago, although I
> wrote programs to do computer logging on DEC, WANG,  and DG minicomputers
> jillion years ago for FD and SS.  I'd never noticed a large error rate
> studying my UBN's.  I have enough hearing loss in my left ear at certain
> frequencies such that often sounds seem "muddled" and I do miss calls when
> doing SO2R and have returned to basic SO1R because of it.  But I wanted to
> see exactly where I was making the errors and I discovered several
> interesting things.
> My typing errors were the first and most obvious culprit when I simply hit
> the wrong key. But I also discovered that I almost always get the call
> if it's a "standard" call, that is a 1x3 or 2x3 or shorter because I have
> in my head cache at speeds up to about 50wpm.    But if it's a
> I have a momentary mental blink and miss the complete call.  Also
> have a mental blink and a degree of error with the Call/QRP.  And last, at
> speeds over 40wpm I mix the "S" and "H", and that from a guy who was K4HHG
> for 40 years.  Also found certain "mental stops" with repeated characters
> and certain  letters like "T", e.g. copy "UTU" as "VTU" or just "TU".
> When I stir this all around with my poor typing, I can see how my UBN is
> higher than I want.  I also think some of this has to do with aging,
> I remember how clearly I could grab calls in my head when I was younger
> (especially in my teens when my head cache was really BIG)  and putting
> down with a pencil.  I tried using a pencil with RUFZ and discovered that
> accuracy did improve, but not enough to give up the wonderful advantage of
> computer logging.
> Anyone else notice this aging by-product?
> Jon Hamlet,  W4ZW
> Casey Key Island, Florida
> "A little piece of paradise in the Gulf of Mexico"
> --
> Barry Kutner, W2UP
> Newtown, PA
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list