[CQ-Contest] Moroccan Mystery

Jim Neiger n6tj at sbcglobal.net
Thu Apr 5 19:31:03 EDT 2007

It appears that the 5D5A operation is the legitimate one.  Apparently the 
bogus CN3A posting is by a disgruntled ??  to further stimulate the 
not-so-loving disagreements between the 5D5A (@CN3A site) Italian operators 
and the Italian operators @ D44AC who are soon moving to the formerly 
world-class D4B site.

Will we soon have a battle of Italian Kilowatts for world supremacy?  (I'm 
taking bets on that one!)  Anyone for on-site inspections???

Isn't life wonderful?

Jim Neiger   N6TJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Pruett" <k8cc at comcast.net>
To: "'CQ-Contest Reflector'" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 8:55 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Moroccan Mystery

> Perhaps somebody can explain to me how this can be:
> CN3A             10221  1659    36 40,653,889     Ops: IK2QEI,IK2SGC,SV8CS
> 5D5A(@CN3A)       6197  1385    48 32,907,600     Ops: IK2QEI,IK2SGC
> How do three operators make 16000 QSOs with as two multi-single entries
> using separate callsigns from one station?
> The 5D5A entry appears in line with the other top M/S scores, but CN3A
> is over the top, and claiming only 36 hours operating time?
> It will be interesting to see how this one turns out when the
> logchecking is done...
> 73,
> Dave/K8CC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list