[CQ-Contest] Battle of the Cheaters

[Ken Widelitz]

While this was sent to me directly, it was anonymous. I doubt Mr. Qwerty
Zxcvbn will object to my forwarding it to the reflector.

I hope this isn’t the “evidence” as to the ultimate TRUTH we all seek (and
some KNOW.)

73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT



-----Original Message-----
From: qwerty zxcvbn [mailto:cheaterswillnotprevail at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 10:14 AM
To: widelitz at gte.net
Subject: Re: The Cheater returns

There is something about ex-YU

Look at this one:

http://lists.contesting.com/_3830/2000-11/msg01139.html

YT6A now 4O3A

Disqualified, two operators.

Look here Results 2000
http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/2WW%20CW%20Results%20Sept%202001%20ALL.pdf?b
csi_scan_2C1B62DD9264DD56=0&bcsi_scan_filename=2WW%20CW%20Results%20Sept%202
001%20ALL.pdf
<http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/2WW%20CW%20Results%20Sept%202001%20ALL.pdf?
bcsi_scan_2C1B62DD9264DD56=0&bcsi_scan_filename=2WW%20CW%20Results%20Sept%20
2001%20ALL.pdf>


Where is the log?
It was submitted to CQ.
Why no mention of disqualification?




On Dec 10, 2007 10:35 AM, qwerty zxcvbn < cheaterswillnotprevail at gmail.com
<mailto:cheaterswillnotprevail at gmail.com> > wrote:

Who is claiming #1 this year?
http://www.radio-sport.net/cqwwcw07_rdp.htm


Who claimed #1 in 2004?
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2004-12/msg00589.html


The log was submitted to CQWW

but

What happened to the log?
http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/1WW%20ResCW2004%20Sep05.pdf


Cheating - too many Multipliers and QSOs - At least another operator
helping.


Why no mention of disqualification in the end?



cheaters will not prevail