[CQ-Contest] cheating with packet
Julius Fazekas
phriendly1 at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 11 21:00:23 EST 2007
I can just hear the swarm now as they hit F4 four or
five times as everyone picks the spot for the new rare
multiplier...
If I wanted to play computer games, I'd go back to
DOOM, much better graphics even for an "ancient" game.
Heck I can play it when I want, no band conditions to
worry about and it's a heck of a lot cheaper... That's
just me, and probably at least a couple others...
I don't think any major contests are proposing such a
change, so currently it's a moot point. The
categories, as they stand now, offer the best to all
competitors.
Frankly, I'm saddened that folks are willing to give
up so much just because a very few haven't the honor
or dignity to abide by basic rules.
Sorry about the diatribe, but that's how I see it.
Best wishes for the Holidays,
Julius
n2wn
--- KI9A at aol.com wrote:
> This is why we need to end the assisted category,
> and open all classes up
> the using packet. If SO2R is ok for a single op, why
> not packet?
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 12/11/2007 6:25:40 A.M. Central
> Standard Time,
> steve.root at culligan4water.com writes:
>
> Exactly! How would you prove you WEREN'T using
> packet? If we knew what the
> log checkers were looking for then we could avoid
> that behavior, but then the
> cheaters would know too. The whole deal kind of
> scares me. Potentially you
> could lose a whole weekend, a top score, and your
> reputation all in one shot.
> Gulp...
> 73 Steve K0SR
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **************************************See AOL's top
> rated recipes
>
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
Julius Fazekas
N2WN
Elecraft K2/100 #3311
Elecraft K2/100 #4455
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list