[CQ-Contest] cheating with packet

[Mike Fatchett W0MU]

Assisted seems to have less competitors which translates to higher
finishes...

I most cases if you are chasing spots you are probably not winning.  Run run
run run run.


On 12/12/07 4:37 PM, "Randy Thompson" <k5zd at charter.net> wrote:

> Because some of us still like to do things the old fashioned way.  All by
> ourselves!  And we like the fact that we can compete in a category with
> other people who feel the same way.  Even makes it more fun when we can beat
> the packet assisted guys.
> 
> I am against combining them because I like to be recognized as a guy who
> knows how to operate.
> 
> I wouldn't mind if they were combined because then all the SOA guys who
> think they are competitive will realize that packet does not a winning score
> make.
> 
> Randy, K5ZD 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
>> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Yuri VE3DZ
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 7:08 PM
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet
>> 
>> I don't like Dx Cluster, but the reality is - like it or not
>> - almost everyone is using it nowadays, one way or another. I
>> mean 99.9 % of the HAM stations have the capability of using
>> Dx Cluster today.
>> So, why not just allow it for all categories, like it was
>> done for WAE or Russian DX long time ago?
>> 
>> What are we afraid of here?
>> 
>> 
>> Yuri  VE3DZ
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest