[CQ-Contest] Public Logs

[David Robbins K1TTT]

Either require the dxpedition logs be submitted to lotw where they can never
be changed, or penalize them 3 qso's for every busted call in their log!  I
think I'll publish all the logs I have ever made from here and demand the
arrl remove dxcc credit for anyone who has me as their only W!  I'll bet
that creates a big uproar.


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Zack Widup
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 04:32
> To: 'CQ-Contest Reflector'
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs
> 
> 
> I don't see it as a mistake.  DXpedition A works W9SG on CW but logs it as
> W9SZ.  W9SZ goes and looks at the complete logs, sees all the QSO info
> there and sends for a card which is issued by the DXpedition QSL manager.
> Now W9SG also sends a card and there's no way to verify who really got
> worked. (I use my call as an example but I would never do this). OR W9SZ
> sends a card and says the DXpedition really worked him. How is this to be
> sorted out?
> 
> Now, without the full QSO info published somewhere, I'd have to actually
> hear W9SG work them to be able to send a card with full QSO info. Possible
> but highly improbable.
> 
> 73, Zack W9SZ
> 
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Steve London wrote:
> 
> > Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> >> Ward,
> >>
> >> DXCC rules prohibit publishing complete logs. In the end, the
> >> publishing of complete logs could result in disallowance of
> >> DXCC credit for "contest DXpedition" QSOs and ultimately the
> >> disqualification from DXCC for anyone who regularly participates
> >> in contests which make logs public.
> >>
> >> see: http://www.arrl.org/blog/DXCC%20Dialog?ofst=25
> >> and: http://www.arrl.org/blog/DXCC%20Dialog?ofst=30
> >
> > A mistake made by a former ARRL employee. I look forward to it being
> corrected
> > by a current ARRL employee.
> >
> >> Any contest sponsor who makes complete logs public should be
> >> censured by the entire amateur community.
> >
> > 2006 CQWW logs are already public. And no DXCC credit has yet been
> removed, nor
> > is it likely it will be removed.
> >
> > Get over it, Joe.
> >
> > 73,
> > Steve, N2IC
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest