[CQ-Contest] Public Logs

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

> Does either of these situations happen enough to be worth worrying
> about?  With operators within "spitting distance" of Honor Roll?  With
> operators within "spitting distance" of the Top 10 box?

It obviously happens enough (or is believed to happen enough) that 
the two programs have adopted rules/policies to address it. 

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of doug smith
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 2:10 AM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs
> 
> 
> We don't want to publish the raw logs because someone might find a
> call similar to theirs in the log & use it to claim a QSL for a QSO
> they didn't make.
> 
> We want to publish the raw logs because it might prove that someone is
> using packet when they claim they aren't.
> 
> Does either of these situations happen enough to be worth worrying
> about?  With operators within "spitting distance" of Honor Roll?  With
> operators within "spitting distance" of the Top 10 box?
> 
> Who really cares if someone cheats their way from 44th place to 39th?
> If they inflate their DXCC total from 137 to 140?
> 
> Are we debating an issue that really doesn't exist?
> 
> ==
> Doug Smith W9WI
> Pleasant View, TN  EM66
> http://www.w9wi.com
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
>