[CQ-Contest] cheating with packet

[Sandy Taylor]

Acutally, there is a difference:

SO (A): it`s still just one person who`s butt`s in the chair. He has no
relief operators for pee breaks, nutrition breaks or sleep.

A true multi-single can rotate as many ops as there are available to keep
the ops fresh, their bladders empty and their stomachs full.

73, Kelly
Ve4xt

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Paul O'Kane
Sent: December-20-07 9:08 AM
To: 'Untitled'
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov at w5ov.com>
 
> In shack spotting by another is multi-op. (More than one operator!)
> 
> Using packet is assisted.
> 
> Big difference.

Let's try a reality check here.

In-shack spotting consists of real-time acceptance of
spotting assistance from one or more other operators.
It is indeed multi-op or, more accurately, multi-single.

The use of packet consists of real-time acceptance of
spotting assistance from one or more other operators.
It is multi-op or, more accurately, multi-single.

There is no difference - apart from the non-issue of the
location of the additional operators.

"Single op assisted" is a weasel way of describing
multi-single by anyone or any organisation that prefers
to ignore reality. 

73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest