[CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843

[Randy Lake]

It has nothing to do with the new era of no Morse and everything to do 
with the band full all the way to the top during the largest world wide 
160m ssb contest in the world. There is nothing illegal about working 
ssb below 1840. I love 160 and love cw, but I see nothing wrong with 
utilizing the band where needed for this weekend. Check the band on 
Monday and see how much ssb there is. If the bandwidth on ssb was 200hz 
or so we would not need to be spread out quite so much. Things will be 
back to normal soon ! I was running around 1945 most of the time and did 
work KH6MD on around 1810 this am. This hobby sure is fun !!
73, Randy N1KWF

Cedrick "Fred" Johnson - WT2P wrote:
> Welcome to the new era of No Morse on the bands...
>
>
> 2p 
>
>
> Cedrick "Fred" Johnson
> WT2P - ex. K9YO, N9YXA
> New York, NY 10031
> AIM: k9yo
> fredwt2p at gmail.com
> http://chibondking.blogspot.com
> Fixed Income | Derivatives | Equities | Research
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> k8vf_mark at centurytel.net
> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 9:47 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
>
> Is it common for fellows to be on SSB below 1843?
> I havent noticed it in a while.
>
> Sure is tough on the 1830-35 DX window.
>
> What is the thought on this?  I dont see why SSB is necessary below 1843,
> which is the normal band plan.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> K8VF 
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>