[CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria

Yuri VE3DZ ve3dz at rigexpert.net
Mon Feb 26 12:16:35 EST 2007


Jeff, why don't you move to New England for a couple of major contests then?
:-))
Just kidding.
Only wanted to remind you that there are some other countries in the World
besides U.S.A.
For instance, there was only 1 spot for Canada in the last WRTC, and guys
from VE5/6/7 had to compete with VE1/VO1/VY2, which I believe makes a bit
more difference, than, for example between Indiana and Tennessee...
IMO, the selection should be made by comparing scores IN THE SAME area. I.E.
W4's have to compete against W4's, VE3's - against VE3's and so on.

73 Yuri  VE3DZ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ku8e at bellsouth.net>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria


> Jim,
>
> The problem is the most of the contests used for scoring are DX contests ,
which the New England
> area has a great advantage over everyone. I think the W4 area - at least
where I am is more equal to
> W5 than it is W1-W3. Even NM can't be that bad of a place. Look how well
N2IC does in DX contests.
>
> Jeff
>



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list