[CQ-Contest] Annoying trend

John Geiger johngeig at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 24 10:39:01 EST 2007


--- Tom Wagner <tfwagner at snet.net> wrote:

> Re check digits and other "unenforced rules"...
> 
> 
> It's really pretty simple, and practical. 
> The ARRL is more interested in encouraging
> participation than enforcing rules that
> don't affect the outcome.  


So instead of sending a consectutive serial number,
which can take more time in sending, would it be ok
for me to give everyone 100 as a serial number, cut to
ATT?  As long as I log that as the sent number for
each QSO in the log, it shouldn't affect the outcome
in any way.

73s John W5TD
WHo sends a check of 80 because I was first licensed
in 1980.




 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list