[CQ-Contest] Annoying trend
John Geiger
johngeig at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 24 10:39:01 EST 2007
--- Tom Wagner <tfwagner at snet.net> wrote:
> Re check digits and other "unenforced rules"...
>
>
> It's really pretty simple, and practical.
> The ARRL is more interested in encouraging
> participation than enforcing rules that
> don't affect the outcome.
So instead of sending a consectutive serial number,
which can take more time in sending, would it be ok
for me to give everyone 100 as a serial number, cut to
ATT? As long as I log that as the sent number for
each QSO in the log, it shouldn't affect the outcome
in any way.
73s John W5TD
WHo sends a check of 80 because I was first licensed
in 1980.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list