[CQ-Contest] RTTY "Listening"
k0xu at iowadsl.net
Tue Jun 19 23:29:07 EDT 2007
At 12:03 PM 6/19/2007, sawyered at earthlink.net wrote:
>I am not a RTTY op so I can't comment on the need to listen or not.
>But I am a low power CW Contester, and as such, I spend more than my
>fair share of time CQing between 7030 - 7080, 14060 - 14100, and
>21060 and 21100.
>I can categorically state that SOME RTTYers are adament that these
>are their frequencies and that it gives them the right to
>intentionally QRM contesters. I can't get through A CONTEST without
>at least a few RTTYers opening up with RTTY dead nuts on my CQing
>frequency at S7 - S9plus on a frequency I have often been on for 10
>mins to over an hour CQing.
>Trust me, when I run my 100W into a 2-stack of 4 element monobanders
>and you are S9 on my meter, I am S7 - S9 plus on yours.
>There is no call for it, speakers or not. A few times I have
>actually listened to see if another RTTY station has responded to
>them. Sometimes they haven't, and the person is still blasting me
>on the frequency that I occupy. One of these days, I am going to
>get on RTTY just to respond to these "idiots" and surprise the hell
>out of the when I say "get off the frequency. QRL". And then go
>back to my CW Contest.
>If anyone doubts this, you are obviously a RTTYer wearing rose
>I could think of nothing, I mean nothing, that would turn me off of
>a contest more, than having RTTY and CW on at the same time (despite
>being listed in the contest section of ARRL's web site, FD is not a
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
Jim Rhodes K0XU
jim at rhodesend.net
Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone.
More information about the CQ-Contest