[CQ-Contest] SPOTTING AD NAUSEUM

[Russell Hill]

Yeah, what Jim said!

There are lots of us out here who genuinely are UNASSISTED.  I never log on 
the internet, telnet, or whatever during a contest, never will.  I do not 
want to be lumped in with the ASSISTED just in case I might be a cheater.

Very 73,
Rusty, na5tr


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane at ei5di.com>
To: "CQ-Contest at contesting. com" <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SPOTTING AD NAUSEUM


> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jim Neiger" <n6tj at sbcglobal.net>
>
>
>> Reality Show.  Packet and spotting is here to stay.  I believe
>> that ASSISTED / NON-ASSISTED should be lumped into one category.
>> If you think spotting  helps, use it.  At least then the (too
>> many) Assisted Cheaters can then use it without being dishonest.
>
> Here's a parallel argument - I don't support it either  :-)
>
> Reality Show.  Amplifiers are here to stay.  I believe that
> HP/LP/QRP should be lumped into one category.  If you think
> power helps, use it.  At least then the (too many) Power
> Cheaters can then use it without being dishonest.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>