[CQ-Contest] (no subject)

[Richard DiDonna NN3W]

That's pretty much the reason why I asked.  If contacts for QSO credit in contests are based on DXCC countries, wouldn't regular DXCC rules apply as to whether the station is based "in" the country?

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Gerry Hull 
To: Richard DiDonna NN3W 
Cc: Shelby Summerville ; cq-contest at contesting.com 
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules


Which brings up a very interesting point.  If it's valid for an ARRL Contest (ARRL DX, for example), why would it not be valid for DXCC Credit?   How would you know your QSL card/electronic QSL is for a remote operation or local? 

I know that certain people are planning to do remote operation from the US using a Caribbean QTH.   This QTH is also very active in contests... 

Maybe we should have a "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy?  :-) 

73,

-- 
Gerry, W1VE/VE1RM
Explore real-time competition in ham radio - post your score to http://www.getscores.org!


On 3/21/07, Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w at cox.net> wrote:
My question is whether this gives implied consent to remote operation from
locations other than the DXCC entity where the operator is physically
located?  The DXCC awards desk certainly doesn't think so.

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww at arrl.net>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com >
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules


> Remember, this is the opinion of the same person that said: "dupes should 
> be
> removed from the log, prior to submission"
>
> C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Mackanos" < mackanos at rpa.net>
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:38 AM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules 
>
>
>>
>>
>> This should clear it up!
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul K2DB
>>
>>  _____
>>
>> From: Hogerty, Tom KC1J [mailto: thogerty at arrl.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:51 AM
>> To: mackanos at rpa.net
>> Subject: FW: Remote Site & Contesting Rules 
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Thanks for your call yesterday and your note. I checked with my expert
>> resources and here's our reply:
>>
>> 
>>
>> The only requirement is that the station from which the contacts are made
>> be
>> contained within the 500-meter limit.  There is NO requirement that the
>> operator (or more appropriately, the transmitter control point) be within 
>> the 500-meter limit.  Remote operation on that basis is fine.  The
>> station
>> is operating under remote control according to FCC rules and that's
>> completely legitimate.
>>
>>
>>
>> What is NOT allowed is the use of transmitting or receiving equipment
>> separated by more than the 500-meter limit, regardless of the location of
>> the control point for the transmitter. 
>>
>>
>>
>> So - if the entire station is contained within the 500-meter limit, it
>> can
>> be operated under local control (operator on-site) or by remote control
>> (operator outside the 500-meter limit and connected by any means that
>> allows
>> control of the transmitter).
>>
>>
>>
>> 73,
>> Tom Hogerty, KC1J
>> Contest Manager
>> ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio
>> 860-594-0232
>> thogerty at arrl.org
>>
>>  _____
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list 
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest