[CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO

[Paul J. Piercey]

Now's your chance, Herb. The way this is going, you could probably even work
yourself and it may count. :)

73 -- Paul VO1HE  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
> Herbert Schoenbohm
> Sent: March 21, 2007 14:22
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO
> 
> Mark, N5OT four  principles on remote stations are right on 
> point especially in today's age of great broadband 
> connectivity and latency improvements. Where the op is 
> located should not be the issue, where the station is located 
> is everything. 
> 
> Now will someone please put a remote station in the remote 
> areas of Yukon and NWT so some year I can finally get a sweep 
> in the ARRL DX Contest on 160 meters!  
> 
> 73
> 
> Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
> St. Croix, Virgin Islands
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>