[CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules

[Paul J. Piercey]

Hi Joe,

That's interesting. Why is it only the rare ones? Shouldn't it apply to all
entities?


73 -- Paul VO1HE  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe 
> Subich, W4TV
> Sent: March 21, 2007 14:05
> To: 'Richard DiDonna NN3W'; cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules
> 
> 
> NN3W writes:
> 
> > My question is whether this gives implied consent to remote 
> operation 
> > from locations other than the DXCC entity where the operator is 
> > physically located?  The DXCC awards desk certainly doesn't 
> think so.
> 
> For many of the more rare DXCC entities the DXCC desk 
> requires documentation that the operator was actually in the 
> entity - usually stamped passport and "landing permits."  It 
> would be rather difficult to provide those documents for a 
> remote operation! 
> 
> 73, 
> 
>    ... Joe, W4TV 
>    
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>