[CQ-Contest] Remote - my 2 centavos worth

Joe Subich, W4TV w4tv at subich.com
Fri Mar 30 07:21:06 EST 2007


No ... remote sites in "RF quiet" locations with room for large
antenna systems, particularly when located in "favored" locations 
outside the section/state/country of the operator are a significant 
advantage compared to the 'normal' operator who must put up with 
limitations of an apartment, HOA antenna restrictions, noise, etc.  

The current technology imposes a bit of a handicap on remote 
operation due to latency issues but that penalty will continue 
to narrow quickly. 

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
 



Gerry writes: 

> That's just plain wrong.   That would make remotely-operated stations
> second-class citizens.
> 
> >
> > On 3/29/07, Tony Rogozinski < trogo at telegraphy.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Simple idea - let the folks who want to operate remote 
> > > from wherever and however do their thing in a
> > > "remote category" and the rest of us will continue to 
> > > operate contests as we've done for the past 50 or 60 years.  




More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list