[CQ-Contest] Remote - my 2 centavos worth
Joe Subich, W4TV
w4tv at subich.com
Fri Mar 30 07:21:06 EST 2007
No ... remote sites in "RF quiet" locations with room for large
antenna systems, particularly when located in "favored" locations
outside the section/state/country of the operator are a significant
advantage compared to the 'normal' operator who must put up with
limitations of an apartment, HOA antenna restrictions, noise, etc.
The current technology imposes a bit of a handicap on remote
operation due to latency issues but that penalty will continue
to narrow quickly.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
Gerry writes:
> That's just plain wrong. That would make remotely-operated stations
> second-class citizens.
>
> >
> > On 3/29/07, Tony Rogozinski < trogo at telegraphy.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Simple idea - let the folks who want to operate remote
> > > from wherever and however do their thing in a
> > > "remote category" and the rest of us will continue to
> > > operate contests as we've done for the past 50 or 60 years.
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list