[CQ-Contest] Check numbers again

[John Geiger]

But it also says:

The required exchange consists of: 

4.4. Check (the last two digits of the year you were
first licensed); 


If I can ignore that one, why can't I also ignore rule
4.1?  

73s John AA5JG



--- Bill Parry <bparry at rgv.rr.com> wrote:

> The rules say:
> 
> Exchange: The required exchange consists of: 
> 4.1. A consecutive serial number;
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf
> Of John Geiger
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 2:06 PM
> To: Gerry Hull; Zack Widup; Cq-Contest Reflector
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Check numbers again
> 
> Given that most contesters are used to copying 599
> or
> 5nn in the exchange, would it be ok to use 599 as
> the
> serial number for every QSO, as long as my log
> showed
> that it was the SN sent for each QSO?  That should
> be
> easier for people to copy as opposed to all
> different
> sorts of serial numbers.
> 
> 73s John AA5JG
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com