[CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R

[John Klim, N3KHK]

1.	All flames to me.
2.	The only score(s) I want to beat are my own scores!
3.	I do SO1R; I currently do not have the space for proper antennas, SO
WHAT!  I enjoy all of the contacts I make. Actually, a very small amount
compared to the big guns.
4.	This is not a NANNY state, yet.  
5.	I get the contest results and I mostly read the soapbox reports from
the different contesters. This is one way of getting to know the other
operators better.
6.	Categories, if we try we could probably come up with maybe 40 or
more categories.  
7.	One personnel question:  Are there any operators willing (or crazy
enough) to try SO3R or SO4R?  IF YES, PLEASE get a web cam going because I
would love to see someone try SO3R and SO4R.


CU ARRL 10m, I know we are at the bottom of the cycle.

 73 ES CUL
 =======================================================
Mr. John R. Klim II
N3KHK
ARRL LM-0008416263, AMSAT  LM-2187,  QRPARCI  #10392,  FISTS  # 5015,  MQFD
#115,  
10-X Life Member  # 68135,  Springbok Chapter  # 1874,  Chesapeake Bay
Chapter  # 549
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 7:52 PM
To: 'Jon Kimball, KL2A'; cq-contest at contesting.com
Cc: nccc at contesting.com; 'wwdxc'
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R


What a crock!  It simply shows that you failed to plan properly 
or to recycle the old quote "those who fail to plan, plan to fail." 

It is, as it always has been, SINGLE OPERATOR not SINGLE RADIO 
category and this constant yammering BS about SO1R vs. SO2R is 
nothing but crap from those who "are not willing to be all they 
can be."  

Life ain't fair and there is no level playing field so get over 
it. 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jon 
> Kimball, KL2A
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 3:43 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Cc: nccc at contesting.com; wwdxc
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R
> 
> 
> 
> CALLING ALL SO1R CONTESTERS!
> 
> SO2R and SO1R are not the same.  Therefore I am offering a 
> certificate for the top 10 scores in SO1R.
> 
> This is SINGLE OP, ALL BAND, 1 RADIO, HIGH POWER, NO PACKET.
> 
> 
> The History:
> 
> I traveled to the middle east set to do SO2R, then realized suddenly 
> I didn't have all the filtering needed to make it work properly.  I 
> finally got it!  Now I know exactly what many of the competitive SO1R 
> guys feel in this situation having to compete with 1 leg tied up.
> 
> At the largest station in the region, automated and ready for battle 
> I scratch my head realizing there is no separate category to compete
> SO1R.
> 
> Therefore, in order to offer a fair competition, I would like to 
> challenge all other SO1R, all band, high power contesters around the 
> world.  I will personally send out certificates to the Top 10 SO1R HP
> guys.
> 
> The hope is that someday soon the results will display a distinction 
> between the very different classes, within a class.
> 
> Start your engines!
> 
> 73 and Good Luck KL2A/9K2HN
> 9K2HN Live Contest Audio broadcasting SO1R at 
> http://attenuate.org:8000 , entire contest.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. 
> Make Yahoo! your homepage.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest