[CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already
Scott Robbins
w4pa at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 26 17:06:41 EST 2007
KL2A writes:
"At the largest station in the region, automated and ready for battle
I scratch my head realizing there is no separate category to compete
SO1R.
The hope is that someday soon the results will display a distinction
between the very different classes, within a class."
I was at K8AZ's M/S this weekend. Tom has 4 rigs set up for M/S so up to 3
additional bands could be monitored by S&P ops hunting mults while a 4th band
is used for running. If he wanted to take it further, he'd get a 5th radio as
the second in-band run rig interlocked with the primary a la the M/M's.
An unfair advantage, or extremely competitive and resourceful?
I say the latter. How is this MS scenario much different than the endless
discussion about SO1R/SO2R and separate categories or separate "score
reporting"?
Do we need MS1R MS2R MS3R MS4R categories?
M2/2R M2/4R ... 5R?
MM4R MM6R MM12R?
Scott W4PA
W4PA Contest Blog - http://w4pa.journalspace.com
What Is Radio Contesting? - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contesting
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list