[CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY

[Steve London]

This problem is easily solved....

If the CQWW RTTY Contest is now on par with the other CQWW's (Phone and CW), 
then change the CQWW RTTY rules to be the same as the other CQWW's. Contacts 
within your own country would count 0 points. This would greatly reduce the 40 
meter RTTY activity during the USA daytime, allowing room for TQP participants.

There are plenty of other RTTY contests that are everyone-works-everyone. It's 
high time that CQWW RTTY have the same rules as the real CQWW's.

73,
Steve, N2IC/5

Randy Thompson wrote:
> The CQWW RTTY Contest has truly become a major event on par with the Phone
> and CW versions.  Activity is growing every year.
> 
> I suggest the TQP think about moving to a different weekend!  I would love
> to work them, but the RTTY contest is more fun.
> 
> Randy, K5ZD
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com 
>> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Eric Hilding
>> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 2:21 PM
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY
>>
>> Methinks there needs to be some "Gentleperson's Agreement" 
>> put in place to dispense with the major problem of CQ RTTY 
>> stations thrashing the Texas QSO Party on 40m.
>>
>> Like, keep 7.047 to 7.053 (at least) free for the 
>> Distinguished Contesters from Texas to also enjoy their 
>> event.  RTTY on 40m was down to about 7.025 on Saturday 
>> morning, with the #&^! Chinese Woodpecker wreaking havoc here 
>> up to 7.020 which left only 5Khz for any kind decent CW on 40m.
>>
>> FWIW & 73...
>>
>> Rick, K6VVA
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>