[CQ-Contest] Article on CW in the Wall St Journal today,

[Alex Malyava]

I, personally, do not believe in CW decoders.
So far I have not seen any "perfect" decoder capable of decoding weak cw
under strong qrm/qrn.
The best, I think, is MRP40, but it is not any better than human brain.


2007/10/8, José Nunes CT1BOH <ct1boh at gmail.com>:
>
> There seems to be this constant talking about keeping CW alive.
> The way it is going it will never die.
> CW contest attract more and more participants than ever.
> Why? Surely I don't see more people learning the code. What I see it more
> and more people using CW decoders.
>
> This last CQWW CW from CT3NT I was called on CW by many SSB only
> operators.
>
> CW will become a sort of RTTY mode for those who cannot or do not want to
> learn it, but want to enjoy the advantages of CW.
>
> 73
> --
> José Nunes
> CONTEST CT1BOH - http://www.qsl.net/ct1boh
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>