[CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY

Dennis McAlpine dbmcalpine at earthlink.net
Sun Sep 30 20:38:34 EDT 2007


Agreed.  The RTTY signals just about wiped out 40 much of the time for TX stns,  particularly the weaker mobiles.  It was about the same as trying to dodge the Shortwave Broadcast stations up on the SSB portion of 40 before the band was opened up.

73,

Dennis, K2SX

-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Hilding <b38 at hilding.com>
>Sent: Sep 30, 2007 10:21 AM
>To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>Subject: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY
>
>Methinks there needs to be some "Gentleperson's Agreement" put in place 
>to dispense with the major problem of CQ RTTY stations thrashing the 
>Texas QSO Party on 40m.
>
>Like, keep 7.047 to 7.053 (at least) free for the Distinguished 
>Contesters from Texas to also enjoy their event.  RTTY on 40m was down 
>to about 7.025 on Saturday morning, with the #&^! Chinese Woodpecker 
>wreaking havoc here up to 7.020 which left only 5Khz for any kind decent 
>CW on 40m.
>
>FWIW & 73...
>
>Rick, K6VVA
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list