[CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision
Ernesto Martin Grueneberg
ernesto.martin.grueneberg at googlemail.com
Mon Apr 7 02:18:39 EDT 2008
Hey Ranko, are you serious? if the maximum allowed power is 1500W how
come you think 1780W is OK?
You are not serious, are you?
PS: maybe you should tell us what other rules doesn´t really apply to you.
2008/4/6, 4O3A <yt6a at cg.yu>:
> Hi Steve,
> that's my opinion. Maybe, as am not English native, I said that a bit to
> artless. Maybe should say - it is not important and significant braking of
> rules and does not give any advantage or change final score at all. Same as
> running 1780W instead 1500W by rules.
> Let keep a right direction and try to have contesting in fair play field.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve London" <n2icarrl at gmail.com>
> To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 3:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision
> > 4O3A wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >> After long and sometimes bothering discussion about this subject my final
> >> opinion and decision is :
> >> 1. 4O3A did not brake rules in any segments, at all. It is written that
> >> we
> >> have to exchange RS(T) plus serial number, and 4O3A did it on one simple,
> >> shortest way possible. It is not written you have to say - Five Nine
> >> clearly, or to shortcut or whatever. Having log lines with same data (
> >> 59,
> >> 59 ) confirm that both station understood RS and make logging with
> >> default
> >> value. Everybody who did contesting clearly understand that and many
> >> contesters did the same. No problem with that.
> > Yeah...that's just your opinion, Ranko. Let no one reading this be
> > confused that
> > what you state is a fact, endorsed by the WPX CC.
> >> 2. 4O3A did more fairly than most of competitors broadcasting whole
> >> contest
> >> in real time. It was done with goal to make contesting more open, and to
> >> help beginners to learn more quickly and easily
> > Your broadcasting has nothing to do with this. Go back and reread my
> > original
> > e-mail that started this thread. You were not the only callsign mentioned
> > in the
> > e-mail. Anyone who is loud and semi-competent should expect to be
> > scrutinized.
> >> But when I take the center stage in this way, I have to operate perfectly
> >> because will be a role model for those who are listening myself. This is
> >> main point.
> > This is the first correct and honorable statement you have made. Excellent
> > !
> > 73,
> > Steve, N2IC
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest