[CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision

[Ernesto Martin Grueneberg]

Hey Ranko, are you serious? if the maximum allowed power is 1500W how
come you think 1780W is OK?

You are not serious, are you?

Ernesto
LU5CW

PS: maybe you should tell us what other rules doesn´t really apply to you.

2008/4/6, 4O3A <yt6a at cg.yu>:
> Hi Steve,
>
>  that's my opinion. Maybe, as am not English native, I said that a bit to
>  artless. Maybe should say - it is not important and significant braking of
>  rules and does not give any advantage or change final score at all. Same as
>  running 1780W instead 1500W by rules.
>
>  Let keep a right direction and try to have contesting in fair play field.
>
>  73
>  Ranko
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: "Steve London" <n2icarrl at gmail.com>
>  To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
>  Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 3:57 PM
>  Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision
>
>
>  > 4O3A wrote:
>  >> Hi guys,
>  >>
>  >> After long and sometimes bothering discussion about this subject my final
>  >> opinion and decision is :
>  >>
>  >> 1. 4O3A did not brake rules in any segments, at all. It is written that
>  >> we
>  >> have to exchange RS(T) plus serial number, and 4O3A did it on one simple,
>  >> shortest way possible. It is not written you have to say - Five Nine
>  >> clearly, or to shortcut or whatever. Having log lines with same data (
>  >> 59,
>  >> 59 ) confirm that both station understood RS and make logging with
>  >> default
>  >> value. Everybody who did contesting clearly understand that and many
>  >> contesters did the same. No  problem with that.
>  >
>  > Yeah...that's just your opinion, Ranko. Let no one reading this be
>  > confused that
>  > what you state is a fact, endorsed by the WPX CC.
>  >
>  >>
>  >> 2. 4O3A did more fairly than most of competitors broadcasting whole
>  >> contest
>  >> in real time. It was done with goal to make contesting more open, and to
>  >> help beginners to learn more quickly and easily
>  >
>  > Your broadcasting has nothing to do with this. Go back and reread my
>  > original
>  > e-mail that started this thread. You were not the only callsign mentioned
>  > in the
>  > e-mail. Anyone who is loud and semi-competent should expect to be
>  > scrutinized.
>  >
>  >>
>  >> But when I take the center stage in this way, I have to operate perfectly
>  >> because will be a role model for those who are listening myself. This is
>  >> main point.
>  >
>  > This is the first correct and honorable statement you have made. Excellent
>  > !
>  >
>  > 73,
>  > Steve, N2IC
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > CQ-Contest mailing list
>  > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>  > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  CQ-Contest mailing list
>  CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>