[CQ-Contest] Subject: "Reverse Beacon" Progress Report
rt_clay at bellsouth.net
rt_clay at bellsouth.net
Thu Apr 17 13:37:17 EDT 2008
>
> I fear one of the most enjoyable parts of contesting are gone: the thrill of
> tuning across a rare mult calling CQ for the first time, and you nab him on
> first call since the packet pileup hasn't hit yet.
>
Well, I don't think the "sky is falling" because of Skimmer :) For one thing,
running Skimmer locally as a single op (what I would call "unassisted") is nowhere as useful for finding mults as being connected to a worldwide
network. It is still very much affected by everything else that limits you:
geography, local qrn, etc. So there are still lots of times I think a single op
can beat a local Skimmer in finding weak signals. I you don't believe me,
try running it yourself.
One can also argue that feeding Skimmer spots into the worldwide packet network
will actually decrease the size of packet pileups. The number of participants in
contests is fixed (and as noted, not all use packet). Skimmer will greatly increase
the number of spots coming out. The result is that ratio operators/spots is going
to go way down, so there will be fewer people calling any particular station that is
spotted.
And Skimmer doesn't take away one way to get two rare mults: working one while
you are cq'ing, and then moving them to another band!
Tor
N4OGW
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list