[CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
Michael Dinkelman
mwdink at eskimo.com
Tue Apr 22 13:08:25 EDT 2008
> Take Sweepstakes and CQWW as examples. The most prestigious category, by
> far, is single-op unassisted. If CW Skimmer is banned in this category,
> the temptation to cheat will be almost overwhelming. In SS, 50 additional
> QSOs over the last 12 hours can make the difference between finishing fifth
> or first. In CQWW, an extra 75-100 multipliers would be a similarly huge
> advantage.
>
>
>
Personally I would expect a higher standard of behavior from those who
can TRULY aspire to
the top ten and while they may certainly have a willingness to push to
the limits within the rules,
not a step beyond...
1) if the skimmer is allowed, they will use it
2) if the skimmer is not allowed, they won't
for a TRUE competitor, temptation has nothing to do with, just the rules
.... but then, I'm just naive. (and don't burst my bubble :>)
cheers
dink, n7wa
p.s. notice this email makes NO statement whether it should or should
not be allowed
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list