[CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

[Ken Claerbout]

  As I was reading Pete's note, I kept thinking how is this any different than Packet?  Then along comes K5ZD to steal my thunder.  I can only speak for myself but if something like Packet or Skimmer becomes a part of what is now unassisted single op, it is going to impact my motivation for competing in these events.  I still get a kick out of knowing that the score I produce is solely my own work and without assistance.  I can also appreciate those who enjoy adding new technologies to their operating.  What's wrong with making this a part of the assisted category?  Better yet, change assisted to single op anything goes to cover other technologies sure to come down the pipe.  Name it something sexy like Single Op Technology class.  No, I'm not advocating the addition of another class.
   As I commented to W4PA awhile back, who would have thought the day might come when SSB contests would become the true measure of an operator?  Yes I'm sure a voice recognition skimmer is in the works but good luck with that on 20 meters!
   I have no doubt some will use skimmer to cheat just as they do with Packet or by the other means they employ.  But for heavens sake, lets not make this a part of "the most prestigious category" because of what the lowest common denominators in our sport might try to do.  I believe there is still some honor left among our ranks.  To the contest sponsors, think long and hard about this.  Once this genie is out of the bottle, it ain't going back in.


Ken K4ZW