[CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
Jimk8mr at aol.com
Jimk8mr at aol.com
Wed Apr 23 11:26:09 EDT 2008
In a message dated 4/23/2008 12:12:05 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
k5zd at charter.net writes:
Yes, I realize that guys using code readers do not pass the "your own ears"
requirement. Same for RTTY. Open to suggestion on how to word this better.
Perhaps something like, "by ear, or electronic decoding operating
concurrently from the audio presented to the operator's ear".
Skimming to find stations is a lot like using sonar to find fish. If you
are fishing as an excuse to drink beer in the sun, you have no need for sonar.
If you are competing in a fishing tournament, you are competing based on
your skill, not on who has the best sonar. If you are a commercial fisherman,
you need sonar to find as many fish as you can.
To me contesting is like # 2 above. It is a matter of *finding* and working
as many people as possible, not just working as many people as possible.
If skimming is to not be used, perhaps we need some volunteers to send code
practice consisting of DX callsigns. A human packet spotter would know the
difference between that and a real station, a skimmer I think not.
73 - Jim K8MR
**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car
listings at AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list