[CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
Leigh S. Jones, KR6X
kr6x at kr6x.com
Wed Apr 23 21:29:35 EDT 2008
Tonno Vahk wrote:
> Allowing skimmer in unassisted makes the category pointless and similar to
> assisted.
Or just maybe it makes the assisted category pointless.
Interesting idea, anyway.
> All the calls in CW and SSB modes have to be copied by operator. It is
> that
> simple. Anything else is assisted.
Just how long do you think that it will be before a skimmer for SSB appears.
I've
already worked out the technical details.
> I could easily make 100 more DXCC in CQWW assisted, very easy
> and huge benefit.
This is rich. No objection; read the contest results and you'll note that
often
a single operator unassisted station will work DXCC on three or four bands
in the course of 48 hours.
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list