[CQ-Contest] State QSO parties and CW (further rules deal)

[Julius Fazekas]

Maybe it's the lower participation rate, particularly
with the mobiles. Mobile activity can make or break a
QSO party.

Folks probably have their hands full with two modes in
some cases.

Certainly counting RTTY/digital as a separate QSO does
seem reasonable, versus combining it with CW, you know
that other digital mode ;o)

73,
Julius

--- John Geiger <n5ten at yahoo.com> wrote:

> One thing that I don't like about the rules for many
> of the state QSO parties is that they lump CW and
> the
> digital modes together, in that you can work someone
> on CW or RTTY, but not both.  CW and RTTY are
> different modes.  Why not lump RTTY and SSB together
> as one mode instead, especially since most people
> doing RTTY have the mode switch set to LSB on their
> rigs.  I guess they put CW and RTTY together since
> they are closer in frequency on the band.
> 
> 73s John AA5JG
> 
> --- Dan Kovatch <w8car at buckeye-express.com> wrote:
> 
> > I think the extra point is a factor but CW is the
> > prefered mode to snag 
> > mobiles in QSO parties because of the condx. Much
> > easier to work the roving 
> > mobiles on Cw than on SSB plus they tend to work
> CW
> > a bit more than SSB 
> > (condx allowing). I know the times I have operated
> > in OQP as a mobile SSB 
> > was a bust after only a few minutes on the band
> > where rates would hold up 
> > for a least 20-30 minutes on CW.
> > 
> > But then again -there are those points!!!!
> > 
> > Dan W8CAR
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "John Geiger" <n5ten at yahoo.com>
> > To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 2:16 PM
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] State QSO parties and CW
> > 
> > 
> > > The Florida QSO party this past weekend reminded
> > me of
> > > something I have observed for the past few
> years.
> > > With the exception of maybe the California QSO
> > party,
> > > there seems to be much more CW than SSB activity
> > for
> > > state QSO parties.
> > >
> > > I am not complaining as I like CW contests and
> > just
> > > tolerate SSB contests, but why is this?  It
> seems
> > that
> > > SSB would be easier to run while mobile.
> > >
> > > Does the extra points that CW QSOs score
> relative
> > to
> > > SSB QSOs make everyone stick with CW?
> > >
> > > 73s John AA5JG
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > > Be a better friend, newshound, and
> > > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
> > >
> >
>
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > >
> >
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> >
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>      
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and 
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
>
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 


Julius Fazekas
N2WN

Tennessee Contest Group
TnQP http://www.tnqp.org/

Elecraft K2/100 #3311
Elecraft K2/100 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366