[CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS
Paul J. Piercey
p.piercey at nl.rogers.com
Fri Dec 5 08:08:30 EST 2008
I agree. That's the same as saying any section with more than, say, 25
operators in it should be considered worked by default. If everyone can get
a sweep, the contest becomes meaningless.
73 -- Paul VO1HE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of K0HB
> Sent: December 4, 2008 23:48
> To: Leonard J. Umina; cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS
>
> >
> > The ARRL could go a long way toward fixing this problem by making a
> > minor change to the rules - if the section is not populated
> enough to
> > field at least 5 stations during a contest then it should not be
> > necessary to work it.
> >
>
> Such a rule would destroy SweepStakes.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list