[CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS

Paul J. Piercey p.piercey at nl.rogers.com
Fri Dec 5 08:08:30 EST 2008


I agree. That's the same as saying any section with more than, say, 25
operators in it should be considered worked by default. If everyone can get
a sweep, the contest becomes meaningless.

73 -- Paul VO1HE
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of K0HB
> Sent: December 4, 2008 23:48
> To: Leonard J. Umina; cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS
> 
> > 
> > The ARRL could go a long way toward fixing this problem by making a 
> > minor change to the rules - if the section is not populated 
> enough to 
> > field at least 5 stations during a contest then it should not be 
> > necessary to work it.
> >
> 
> Such a rule would destroy SweepStakes.  
> 
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list