[CQ-Contest] Open Letter to CAC

[Dale Putnam]

Ahhhh.. but sir... at this point... It strikes me that the pretty much this entire discussion is outside 
the scope of pure ethical technicalities. That is evidenced by either listening to about any contest...
or reading a bit.. before mashing the delete key...as I am tending to do... a lot. --... ...--Dale - WC7S in Wy> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:16:11 -0800> From: n5ten at yahoo.com> To: phriendly1 at yahoo.com; k5zd at charter.net; Tom at k5rc.cc; kh6nd at hawaii.rr.com> CC: cq-contest at contesting.com> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to CAC> > > --- Julius Fazekas <phriendly1 at yahoo.com> wrote:> > > Or even 5nn ATT, the lack of reasonable periodic ID> > is> > one of the most frustrating things. > > But don't the general rules for all contests cover> this? It states:> > 3.2.All callsigns and exchange information must be> sent, received, acknowledged and logged correctly by> each station for a complete QSO. > > Technically both stations must send both callsigns for> each QSO.> > 73s John AA5JG> > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs> _______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list> CQ-Contest at contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_________________________________________________________________
Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with star power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan