[CQ-Contest] Dumbing-Down Contests?

w5ov at w5ov.com w5ov at w5ov.com
Thu Feb 21 18:31:40 EST 2008


EI5DI said:
> It is broke!  It has been broken for over 20 years - since
> computer logging became the norm.
>
> CT, the first major contest logger, had no provision for
> logging RST Sent as anything other than 59(9).  Since then,
> the mindless exchange of 59(9) has become redundant.
>

Paul,

599, or more accurately 5NN has been the default signal report for at
least the 35 years that I have been contesting / DXing and probably goes
back even longer than that.

I think it might be more accurate to say that CT followed the de facto
standard of logging 599 as the sent RST instead of causing it.

73,

Bob W5OV


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list