[CQ-Contest] rules

[w1md at cfl.rr.com]

But if "Skimmer" was part of the "Assisted" category then your "unassisted" record wouldn't be affected...or did I miss something in the translation? I'm assuming your 10m SBSO effort was of the unassisted kind...

Marty
W1MD

---- Bill Tippett <btippett at alum.mit.edu> wrote: 
> 
> 
> K3NA:
> 
>  > 3.  In 2010 June, review the results of the past two years to determine
>    a)  Does the use of a CW skimmer have a material impact on scores?
>    b)  If yes, do the award categories need to be changed in some way?
> 
>          What do you do if records set without Skimmer were
> broken *with* Skimmer?  For example I'm quite sure my 10m records
> would all be higher if I had access to multipliers available to 
> multiop stations (with typically 10% higher mults).
> 
> CQ WW CW SOSB/10 record (2000):
> 28   W4ZV                     965,874   1984   37  137  00
> 
> CQ WW CWMulti-Multi record (1999):
> Call: KC1XX
>   10   2020      38     151       Steve K6AW,Matt
> 
>          Excuse me but it doesn't take rocket science to see the
> the potential impact of Skimmer on (previously) unassisted
> records.
>                                          73,  Bill  W4ZV
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest