[CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment

Doug Renwick ve5ra at sasktel.net
Wed Jun 11 15:13:14 EDT 2008


You are correct.  If skimmer is allowed for unassisted, then by simple
extension, packet is allowed for unassisted as I see it.


-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Tippett
Sent: June 11, 2008 8:57 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment

I don't really like any of these alternatives.  Maybe
I'll just cheat and use Packet but claim Unassisted since it will
be virtually impossible to detect the difference with Skimmer, if
it's allowed for Unassisted.  It might be poetic justice to scam
the Skimmers!  :-)

                                         73,  Bill  W4ZV

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list