[CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge - New Category?

Joe Subich, W4TV w4tv at subich.com
Fri Jun 20 10:32:43 EDT 2008


Stan, 

> This category would not compete with the traditional category, and 
> it would not matter whether the winning score is double that of 
> the other category.

Rather than completely "tossing over" the traditional categories, 
it would be easier to adopt a simplified EIRP calculation for "power" 
and perhaps one additional category based on "number of receivers."  

Something along the lines of: 

SO Classic: one operator, computer logging, memory keyers, one 
   transceiver, and no receiver capable of duplex operation 

SO Unlimited: one operator, computer logging, memory keyers, 
   one transceiver, receivers capable of duplex operation 

SO Plus: one operator, computer logging, memory keyers, one 
   transceiver, receivers cable of duplex operation, plus 
   packet/telnet/IRC cluster alerting.  

SO Classic would be have QRP, Low and High power subclasses.  
SOU and SOP would have low and high power subclasses. 

The result would be relatively easy to administer, define classes 
based only on "resources" (both technology and human), be flexible 
regarding future technology, and represent minimal increased cost 
for the sponsor.  It also gives the operator the ability to choose 
an appropriate level of technology and/or input from other persons
for his own situation.  If an operator does not want to compete 
with those receiving help from others they can avoid SOP ... if 
they do not want to compete with those using two receivers (or any 
kind) they can choose SO Classic. 

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
    



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list